The Ministry of Education on Thursday unveiled guidelines for managing the mobile devices of students below the senior-high school level, which would authorize teachers to take students’ phones for safekeeping during the day. In response, a group of high-school students referring to themselves as a movement “defending students’ rights across Taiwan” has demanded the immediate withdrawal of the ministry’s proposal. The group also insists that at least one-third of those involved in the decisionmaking process should be student representatives, and that a ban on cellphone use should apply only to class time rather than the entire day. Many other opinions have also come to light, and Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said he is earnestly thinking about the matter.
In physiology, the brain’s frontal cortex — the part responsible for cognitive control, delayed gratification, resisting temptation and emotional regulation — does not develop fully until after the age of 20. Perhaps young students do not yet know how to protect themselves. Watching screens can cause distractions and superficial understanding. Cellphone hardware and software designers profit from keeping users’ eyes constantly glued to their screens — notification sounds, social media updates and other features subconsciously encourage people to keep scrolling, making it easy to become addicted and difficult to stop, or even look away. This ultimately causes fatigue, late nights and insomnia. From 2009 to 2019, the rate of adolescent depression in the US nearly doubled, while an estimated 31.9 percent of adolescents had anxiety disorders.
At home, restrictions on cellphone use often cause tension between parents and their children. At school, students secretly use their phones during class — with some even using fake phones during teacher inspections — which inevitably leads to conflict between teachers and students.
The management of mobile phones is an issue that requires collective action. While student cellphone use should be managed during school hours, that effort is wasted if they are allowed to use their phones freely as soon as they get home. A combined effort by teachers and parents to prevent children from bringing their phones to school would ensure that no child needs to worry about being left out, as they would all have companions to spend time with.
Last year, the Lackawanna School District in New York banned students from using mobile phones during the day, a policy known as “no cell from bell to bell.” The district now requires students from grades 6 to 12 to lock their phones in magnetic storage pouches upon arriving at school. The pouches automatically unlock at the end of the school day. At first, many students resisted the policy, using magnets to attempt to open the pouch locks. However, some students shifted from hating the policy to appreciating it — the school also saw that 17 percent more students were passing classes than in the prior year. Students now pay more attention in class, and participation in sports and other activities has also increased.
“We see them [students] paying attention to directions, which has not been a thing for a while,” one teacher said.
The Los Angeles Unified School District since Feb. 18 has also placed a ban on student cellphone use in classrooms. Research shows that this approach not only helps students focus better during class, but also provides more opportunities for social interaction and communication.
I once looked around in the school cafeteria and noticed that nearly all of the students were scrolling on their phones while eating. It is clear that cellphones have now become the sole object of students’ obsession. In contrast, in places such as the UK, France and Japan, restaurants post signs reminding consumers that they must put away their phones, writing messages such as: “We are happy to see people interacting with each other even more than before, and we have infused this warmth into our dishes.”
Students must not become slaves to their cellphones. Encouragingly, some students reached out to their instructors at the end of the semester, treating them to meals to thank them for helping them solve their phone addictions. Such students are unlikely to protest reasonable cellphone management by parents and teachers, and they no longer stare at their phone screens while eating.
Ji-shing is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has